Comments on: Lighthouse Bug Tracking Review

By: Ernesto

Ernesto — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:57:40 +0000

We had the same trouble looking for something that can work as project management and bug tracking. We came to the conclusion that many of our clients don’t know how to classify a request, is it a bug? Is it a new feature? Is it a change order? So we opted out of that and worked with Project Pier for client end and dotproject for out backend. Now we’re experimenting with Basecamp since running two separate systems has gotten to be a bit of a hassle and we don’t exactly have time to create a integration module between them. Perhaps one of these days.

Ernesto

]]>

By: I'd rather not

I'd rather not — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:05:21 +0000

Is it just me or is Roger Pogue a BugWiki employee. I have been researching some bug tracking tools recently and everywhere I see, there are some recent comments about how good bugwiki is (twitter, some bug tracker comparisons etc). I look at bugwiki and it’s no better than scribbling down stuff in a spreadsheet. I am not saying it’s bad (everything has it’s uses), but persistent comments stating how great bugwiki is, is pretty darn suspicious. Especially on a post that is a year old?

]]>

By: Roger Pogue

Roger Pogue — Tue, 20 May 2008 17:57:38 +0000

I have been using BugWiki (https://www.bugwiki.com) for some time and I think it is has a lot going for it. It doesn’t get any simpler, the only question is if your team needs customization. If so, BugWiki is not for you, but otherwise I recommend it.

]]>

By: Tony Honel

Tony Honel — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:56:31 +0000

Dude, I use Wrike http://www.wrike.com/ for bug tracking and for my project management. It’s simple and lets your track bugs using screen shots.

]]>

By: Carmelo Lisciotto

Carmelo Lisciotto — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:52:41 +0000

I had difficulty with it as well.

Carmelo Lisciotto
http://www.carmelolisciotto.com

]]>